Exploring the 4 Property Rule
Portfolio lending is on the rise. The main reason for this is portfolio lending is not subject to the crazy 4 property rule. Through a portfolio lender, it is possible to have more than 20 mortgages. But those investors looking for conventional loans through lenders such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will run into the 4 property rule wall.
Obviously new lending rules were needed to curb the losses of hundreds of lenders that are now out of business. But, in my opinion, the 4 property rule is ridiculous. In fact, this rule borders on Socialism. The 4 property rule severely hinders the ability of a real estate investor to continue doing business.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
Specifically, if you are still financing your primary residence, you can only flip three properties if they are currently being financed! Again, this type of rule does very little for aiding investment circles. Really, it is a form of protectionism. And, as history shows, protectionism has the inverse consequence of what it was originally intended. That is to say, it does nothing to help the market and overall economy. Instead, the 4 property rule can significantly weaken the economy.
Before the subprime meltdown, investors took advantage of rapidly increasing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. Sometimes, real estate investors purchased huge volumes of properties to resell. The affordable housing they provided had a positive impact on our economy.
If the 4 property rule went away, there would be many positive effects. First, real estate investors would have to put their profits somewhere and my bet is they would go to the stock market. That in itself would provide a huge amount of liquidity. It would also fill up the tax coffers. And, of course, the wealth created would lead to more real estate being purchased thus improving values overall. The 4 property rule accomplishes none of this. I hope this rule will be overturned so we investors can fully participate in and contribute to the economic recovery.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
Related posts:
- How A Rental Property Refinance Option Works Refinancing a rental property is a good idea when property...
- Locating Forclosure property is easier then you think In a down real estate market, finding foreclosed homes is...
- Investing in Foreclosures These days we have so many options we can use...
- Tic investing for Boomers. Boomers Bank In investment finance, private equity real estate is...
- Real estate investment is about finding good deals Real estate investments are often treated as one the best...